Given an array of strings A
, two strings S
and T
are considered special-equivalent if you can transform S
into T
by swapping any number of pairs of characters at even indices, and/or any number of pairs of characters at odd indices.
Your task is to determine how many groups of special-equivalent strings exist in A
. Each string belongs to exactly one group, and no string is in more than one group.
Constraints:
A
has the same length.A
.At first glance, the problem seems to require checking all possible swaps for each string to compare with others, which would be computationally expensive. However, upon closer inspection, we realize that swapping characters at even indices among themselves and odd indices among themselves means that the order within even and odd positions does not matter—only their multisets do.
Therefore, instead of brute-forcing all swaps, we can try to find a canonical form or signature for each string. If two strings have the same canonical form (i.e., the same characters at even indices, and the same at odd indices, up to reordering), they belong to the same special-equivalent group.
This insight allows us to reduce the problem to grouping strings by their canonical forms.
Let's break down the optimized solution step by step:
This approach leverages the mathematical property that swapping within a group is equivalent to treating the group as a multiset, and sorting is a simple way to create a unique identifier for a multiset.
Let's consider the input A = ["abc","acb","bac","bca","cab","cba"]
.
Brute-force approach:
n
, splitting and sorting takes O(n log n) time.m
strings, total time is O(m * n log n).This is efficient and works well within typical Leetcode constraints.
The key insight is that swapping within even or odd indices is equivalent to treating those characters as unordered groups. By sorting the characters at even and odd indices separately, we can generate a unique signature for each special-equivalent group. Grouping strings by these signatures gives us the answer efficiently, avoiding brute-force permutations and comparisons.
This solution is elegant because it reduces a seemingly complex equivalence relation to a simple signature-based grouping problem.
class Solution:
def numSpecialEquivGroups(self, A):
signatures = set()
for word in A:
even = sorted(word[::2])
odd = sorted(word[1::2])
signature = (''.join(even), ''.join(odd))
signatures.add(signature)
return len(signatures)
class Solution {
public:
int numSpecialEquivGroups(vector<string>& A) {
unordered_set<string> signatures;
for (const string& word : A) {
string even, odd;
for (int i = 0; i < word.size(); ++i) {
if (i % 2 == 0) even += word[i];
else odd += word[i];
}
sort(even.begin(), even.end());
sort(odd.begin(), odd.end());
signatures.insert(even + "|" + odd);
}
return signatures.size();
}
};
class Solution {
public int numSpecialEquivGroups(String[] A) {
Set<String> signatures = new HashSet<>();
for (String word : A) {
char[] even = new char[(word.length() + 1) / 2];
char[] odd = new char[word.length() / 2];
for (int i = 0; i < word.length(); ++i) {
if (i % 2 == 0) even[i / 2] = word.charAt(i);
else odd[i / 2] = word.charAt(i);
}
Arrays.sort(even);
Arrays.sort(odd);
String signature = new String(even) + "|" + new String(odd);
signatures.add(signature);
}
return signatures.size();
}
}
var numSpecialEquivGroups = function(A) {
const signatures = new Set();
for (let word of A) {
let even = [];
let odd = [];
for (let i = 0; i < word.length; ++i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) even.push(word[i]);
else odd.push(word[i]);
}
even.sort();
odd.sort();
const signature = even.join('') + '|' + odd.join('');
signatures.add(signature);
}
return signatures.size;
};