The NPV Queries problem involves evaluating a series of cash flows and answering queries about their Net Present Value (NPV). You are given an array cashflows
where cashflows[i]
represents the cash flow at time i
. You are also given a list of queries
, where each query consists of a discount rate r
. For each query, you must compute the NPV of the cash flows using the given discount rate.
The Net Present Value for a discount rate r
is calculated as:
NPV = cashflows[0] + cashflows[1]/(1+r) + cashflows[2]/(1+r)^2 + ... + cashflows[n-1]/(1+r)^(n-1)
1 <= len(cashflows) <= 10^4
, 1 <= len(queries) <= 10^4
, -10^4 <= cashflows[i] <= 10^4
, -0.99 <= r <= 10
To solve this problem, the first thought is to directly compute the NPV for each query by iterating through the cashflows
array and applying the formula. For each query, we would recalculate the denominator for each cash flow, which involves exponentiation. With up to 10,000 queries and 10,000 cash flows, a naive approach could result in up to 100 million computations, which may be slow.
To optimize, we can look for patterns or opportunities to avoid redundant calculations. Since each query uses a different discount rate, we cannot precompute denominators. However, we can use iterative multiplication to avoid repeated exponentiation. By keeping track of the current power of (1 + r)
as we iterate, we can compute each term efficiently.
Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of the optimized solution:
npv
to 0.denominator
to 1 (since (1 + r)^0 = 1
).cashflows
array:
cashflows[i] / denominator
to npv
.denominator *= (1 + r)
for the next term.npv
to five decimal places.This approach avoids expensive exponentiation by using cumulative multiplication, making the solution much faster.
Suppose cashflows = [1000, -500, 200]
and queries = [0.1, 0.05]
.
r = 0.1
:
1000 / 1 = 1000.0
-500 / 1.1 ≈ -454.54545
200 / 1.21 ≈ 165.28926
r = 0.05
:
1000 / 1 = 1000.0
-500 / 1.05 ≈ -476.19048
200 / 1.1025 ≈ 181.48820
The output would be [710.74381, 705.29772]
.
O(Q * N)
, where Q
is the number of queries and N
is the number of cash flows. Each query computes each term separately, possibly using exponentiation.O(Q)
for the results.O(Q * N)
, but with a smaller constant factor since we avoid repeated exponentiation.O(Q)
for the output list.The optimized approach is much faster in practice due to efficient term calculation.
The NPV Queries problem requires computing the net present value of a series of cash flows for multiple discount rates. By recognizing that exponentiation can be replaced with iterative multiplication, we achieve a fast and efficient solution suitable for large inputs. This approach demonstrates the power of mathematical insight and computational optimization in algorithm design.
def npvQueries(cashflows, queries):
res = []
n = len(cashflows)
for r in queries:
npv = 0.0
denom = 1.0
for cf in cashflows:
npv += cf / denom
denom *= (1 + r)
res.append(round(npv, 5))
return res
#include <vector>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
std::vector<double> npvQueries(const std::vector<int>& cashflows, const std::vector<double>& queries) {
std::vector<double> res;
for (double r : queries) {
double npv = 0.0;
double denom = 1.0;
for (int cf : cashflows) {
npv += cf / denom;
denom *= (1 + r);
}
// Round to 5 decimal places
npv = std::round(npv * 1e5) / 1e5;
res.push_back(npv);
}
return res;
}
import java.util.*;
public class Solution {
public List<Double> npvQueries(int[] cashflows, double[] queries) {
List<Double> res = new ArrayList<>();
for (double r : queries) {
double npv = 0.0;
double denom = 1.0;
for (int cf : cashflows) {
npv += cf / denom;
denom *= (1 + r);
}
// Round to 5 decimal places
npv = Math.round(npv * 1e5) / 1e5;
res.add(npv);
}
return res;
}
}
function npvQueries(cashflows, queries) {
const res = [];
for (const r of queries) {
let npv = 0.0;
let denom = 1.0;
for (const cf of cashflows) {
npv += cf / denom;
denom *= (1 + r);
}
// Round to 5 decimal places
npv = Math.round(npv * 1e5) / 1e5;
res.push(npv);
}
return res;
}