You are given an array of integers ids that contains unique IDs from 1 to n, but some IDs are missing. The array may not be sorted. Your task is to find all the missing IDs in the range from 1 to n that are not present in ids. Return the missing IDs in a sorted list.
ids of length m (where m <= n) and an integer n.1 to n (inclusive), sorted in ascending order.n.
The problem is to identify which IDs from 1 to n are missing from the given ids array. A brute-force approach would be to check, for each number from 1 to n, whether it exists in ids. However, this would be inefficient, especially for large values of n and m, since searching in an array takes O(m) time for each check.
To optimize, we need a way to quickly check if a number is present in ids. Using a set data structure allows O(1) lookups, making it much more efficient. Thus, the plan is to convert ids to a set, and then iterate from 1 to n, collecting numbers not found in the set.
This approach is both simple and fast, leveraging the properties of sets for quick membership tests.
ids into a set. This allows for O(1) lookup times when checking if an ID is present.1 to n (inclusive).ids. If it is not, add it to the list of missing IDs.1 to n, the list is naturally sorted in ascending order.This method is efficient and straightforward, making use of built-in data structures to minimize code complexity and maximize performance.
Sample Input:
ids = [4, 3, 2, 7, 8, 2, 3, 1]
n = 8
ids to a set: {1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8} (duplicates are removed automatically).1 to 8:[5, 6]
The missing IDs in the range 1 to 8 are 5 and 6.
ids (O(m) per check).ids to a set: O(m) time and O(m) space.The optimized approach is much faster and uses reasonable extra space for practical input sizes.
To find missing IDs from a range given a list of present IDs, the most efficient method is to use a set for constant-time lookups. This allows us to check each number in the range quickly and collect any that are missing. The approach is simple, leverages built-in data structures, and is easy to implement in any programming language. The key insight is to reduce repeated searches by converting the input to a set, resulting in a clean and efficient solution.
def find_missing_ids(ids, n):
present = set(ids)
missing = []
for i in range(1, n + 1):
if i not in present:
missing.append(i)
return missing
#include <vector>
#include <unordered_set>
std::vector<int> findMissingIDs(const std::vector<int>& ids, int n) {
std::unordered_set<int> present(ids.begin(), ids.end());
std::vector<int> missing;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) {
if (present.find(i) == present.end()) {
missing.push_back(i);
}
}
return missing;
}
import java.util.*;
public class Solution {
public List<Integer> findMissingIDs(int[] ids, int n) {
Set<Integer> present = new HashSet<>();
for (int id : ids) {
present.add(id);
}
List<Integer> missing = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
if (!present.contains(i)) {
missing.add(i);
}
}
return missing;
}
}
function findMissingIDs(ids, n) {
const present = new Set(ids);
const missing = [];
for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
if (!present.has(i)) {
missing.push(i);
}
}
return missing;
}